{"id":2417,"date":"2019-04-12T20:09:55","date_gmt":"2019-04-12T20:09:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/?p=2417"},"modified":"2019-04-12T20:15:45","modified_gmt":"2019-04-12T20:15:45","slug":"things-go-better-with-print","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/things-go-better-with-print\/","title":{"rendered":"Things go better with print?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/2019-04-12_1312.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright  wp-image-2419\" src=\"http:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/2019-04-12_1312-236x300.png\" alt=\"Napoleon Reading\" width=\"186\" height=\"236\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/2019-04-12_1312-236x300.png 236w, https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/2019-04-12_1312.png 407w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 186px) 100vw, 186px\" \/><\/a>I had some spam article from Skylight Press pushed to my Facebook feed by Business Insider. The clickbait reads &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/students-learning-education-print-textbooks-screens-study-2017-10\">A new study shows that students learn way more effectively from print textbooks than screens.<\/a>&#8221; So first off, it is not new, it is from 2017. Secondly, you won&#8217;t be surprised by how hard it is to measure &#8220;way more effectively.&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/abs\/10.3102\/0034654317722961\">The research that the article supposedly references<\/a> does not make any such conclusion. The research says that &#8220;overall, results suggest that medium plays an influential role under certain text or task conditions or for certain readers.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The article gives some fairly weak reasons to possibly and maybe considering print over text but then it goes into my favorite trope: &#8220;There may be economic and environmental reasons to go paperless. But there&#8217;s clearly something important that would be lost with print&#8217;s demise. In our academic lives, we have books and articles that we regularly return to. The dog-eared pages of these treasured readings contain lines of text etched with questions or reflections.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Or we don&#8217;t. I would typically ignore articles like this (TL;DR?) but it caught my attention because of something pretty near wonderful that happened to me this week. I am working on an article about Napoleon and Goethe, and I am looking for Napoleon&#8217;s copy of Werther (his favorite book). Very ambitious of me. I can&#8217;t find it but I did find someone who had. Sarah De Laredo wrote a pamphlet in 1927 that is a description of Napoleon&#8217;s copy of Werther. It was in two libraries: the University of Alberta and Yale. I sent a one line email to the special collections at Yale and they very graciously walked me through registering as an independent scholar and requesting a digital copy of the pamphlet. I got that today. I cannot afford to fly to New Haven; I do not have access to these libraries. The digital world provides people like me a connection to a world of scholarship that would be forever closed off and forgotten otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>Ironically, I wound up reading &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/files\/2527\/2527-h\/2527-h.htm\">The Sorrows of Young Werther<\/a>&#8221; from Gutenberg.net on my Kindle and my phone because I really didn&#8217;t want to buy a copy of it. I understood the text, highlighted it, and made notes just like a real book. I am not sure what my preferences are here &#8211; I think the digital or print question is a false dichotomy. I needed the information, so I was motivated to engage digitally. On top of all this, there are now online annotation tools like <a href=\"https:\/\/web.hypothes.is\/\">Hypothes.is<\/a> that allow users to highlight and comment on texts privately or as a community. In other words, in the future, someone might wonder what my thoughts were on a text and they don&#8217;t have to go to the library or have a library make a copy &#8211; they can go online and look at my annotations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I had some spam article from Skylight Press pushed to my Facebook feed by Business Insider. The clickbait reads &#8220;A new study shows that students learn way more effectively from print textbooks than screens.&#8221; So first off, it is not &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/things-go-better-with-print\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[1399,1398,1358,1396,1397],"class_list":["post-2417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-text","tag-annotation","tag-digitaltexts","tag-etext","tag-hypothes-is","tag-texts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2417\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geoffcain.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}