I am really enjoying the “Teaching with WordPress Course.” It is beginning with the question “what is open pedagogy? I appreciate this. I kind of expected a course on setting up WordPress as an alternative to the LMS but we start (and rightly so) with the question of pedagogy – we are keeping this about teaching and learning. So what is “open pedagogy”? It is not really defined yet. David Wiley said that “open pedagogy” include:
- Teaching and learning practices that are possible with you adopt OER but are impossible when you adopt traditionally copyrighted materials
- Use of OER
- Student work in the open: create and share their work
The Challenge: “…we need at least 15 – 20 more examples before we can have a substantive conversation about open pedagogy.”
This course hopes to provide more examples to help work out the definition. Right now I have this idea that I have participated in a number of courses that utilized an open pedagogy (DS106, CCK08, etc.) but getting a clear idea of what exactly makes those courses open will be an important part of moving forward. We have the opportunity to help shape this definition in this course.
In the discussion of Open Pedagogy, there is a matrix of openness that I think needs more fleshing out with more categories. They expressed a problem with using the word “effective” – I think that the words “engaging” or “interactive” could be used in its place. Maybe the matrix could also rank materials by the relative openness of the licenses going from public domain, through the creative commons licenses and then commercial standard copyright.
The matrix could examine degrees of openness with assignments – I love Wiley’s term “disposable assignments” – ones where the students are all doing to the same one, the teacher is the only one that reads them, and then they go in the trash. The matrix can measure degrees of openness between “learning centered design” and “teaching centered design” that could include “student choice,” “reflective practice,” “flexible,” “real world application” and I would include “collaborative.” I understand that the current matrix is meant to be used in a brainstorming activity, but I find the idea of measuring openness intriguing.
Week 1 recap
It’s been a great start to Teaching with WordPress from our perspective. Here’s a brief summary of this week’s activity on the blog hub and Twitter discussion:
- Opened the week with a presentation/conversation about Open Pedagogy including a matrix for brainstorming examples of course designs and where they fall on the continuum from open to closed/learner centered to teacher centered.
- Comment feeds by category: Tom posted a call out for help, TWPer’s responded and a post was submitted – for everyone’s benefit: http://bionicteaching.com/
- Early sharing of projects, examples of course design and decisions/considerations involved: Alan on connected courses using FeedWP and a backstage look at a FeedWP powered connected course. Mariana’s post about her experience setting up a her own domain in WP. Tom sharing his design for a faculty development course called OLE including a potential link to #TWP15! Mo’s early plans for a course he’s designing with a student
- Alan built his first WP plug-in and shared the process!
- Viv opening the door to a conversation about ethics in the open.
- Jeffrey shares a summary post of curated readings on all things open
- Many more examples of us connnecting, sharing and figuring things out together on Twitter (#TWP15)
Please feel free to add your own summary – tag a post with twpweek1 (see all posts with this tag on our Week 1 discussions page), comment on this page (if you prefer) and (if you like) engage in a personal reflection.
Let’s keep the interactions going in comments on blogs, on Twitter, and here on our site as we move into week 2 soon!
- An overview of the Moodle “open” book project (davidtjones.wordpress.com)